Insurance of any form is rarely a compelling value proposition for consumers. Take, for example, life insurance. Life insurance is the one product that people buy that they hope to never have to use. From the insurer’s perspective, it’s a safe bet: you don’t want to die, and you’ll do whatever you need to in order to avoid it. On the other hand, life insurance can present a compelling value since, as they say, it provides peace of mind. That peace of mind comes from the assurance that when you die, your loved ones will be well supported in your absence. Insurers help manage risks in our lives. Homeowners risk losing their homes in natural disasters, floods, and fires. Automobile drivers risk being crashed into and also crashing into something or someone and thus being exposed to considerable amounts of liability.
But insurers can help you manage other less significant risks, as well. My adventure in obscure insurance services started when I found out that I was eligible for a discount on any Verizon Wireless service thanks to arrangements between Verizon and my employer. When I went to apply the discount to my account, I found out that I couldn’t apply the discount because the account wasn’t in my name. Our entire family was on one plan, and my mother’s name was on the account. So we switched the account to my name. At that time, Verizon had me change my plan around. This proved to be in our favor, and we ended up with a comparable plan for much less per month. One key change to save money was to switch my data plan from unlimited to per-megabyte, since I figured I would rarely spend as much as the cost of the unlimited plan in a single month. A few days later the changes went through, and my discount was applied, lowering the bill even further.
Things were great. I received the first bill, and then noted that on two of the five handsets, a charge appeared: “TEC INSURANCE”, $5.99 per month. TEC, or Total Equipment Coverage, replaces your phone if it is lost, stolen, or broken, for a modest $50 deductible in addition to that $5.99 per-handset monthly premium. My phone wasn’t completely broken, but the online phone claim website allowed me to file a claim for the intermittent failures I was experiencing.
The claim explained that the phone, an LG VX4500, had been through a lot. I lost the antenna, and replaced it with an aluminum twist tie. The outer screen cracked when I was rollerblading in the city one afternoon. Repeated falls onto hard surfaces rendered the volume adjustment buttons inoperative, and also caused the LCD backlight to experience a mysterious 2-to-3 second delay when powering up. Speaking of powering up, the phone would spontaneously power down when the battery was nudged the wrong way since the battery’s plastic tabs were broken. One of the weirder problems was that the LCD display would occasionally go blank. The solution: remove & replace the battery, call *228 (phone activation) and re-program the phone, then the display would come back on when the phone restarts. I’ve had this phone for four years, and I’m comfortable and generally satisfied with it for some reason. It just works –it makes phone calls, sends text messages, and even gets my laptop online via 3G. What more could I want?
My claim didn’t fit into the pre-selected claim categories, so I had to explain the damage just as I listed above. It was approved within a few minutes of submitting it. There was just one problem: the LG VX4500 was discontinued, so they couldn’t replace it. When I called and spoke with a claims representative, they offered me the LG VX4650 instead. I didn’t know the model off hand, so I did a quick Amazon.com search while I was on the phone, which revealed that this phone too was discontinued. I asked how it made sense that I was offered one discontinued phone in place of another discontinued phone. The agent put me on hold, came back, and offered me an LG VX5400. Again unfamiliar with that model number, I searched online and found a slightly used handset for $24 (plus shipping). I asked the agent what was costing so much for the premiums in addition to the $50 deductible if the handset wasn’t worth close to that. The agent couldn’t really explain. I asked if any other handsets were available, but they said those were all my options. I politely declined to complete my claim until I could investigate the matter further.
The first thing I did was look up all three phones — my original LG VX4500 handset, and the VX4650 and VX5400 as well. At that moment, there was at least one of each phone listed on eBay. The market prices for the phones I was offered, accessories included, on eBay were:
LG VX4650 - Offered replacement handset - $16 (+s/h)
LG VX5400 - 2nd offered replacement handset - $24 (+s/h)
The real kick in the nuts was that on top of the pre-paid $5.99 per-month premiums, the insurance company’s $50 premium didn’t cover the separate shipping and handling fee for the replacement handset.
Maybe this service could be a good value for people that have these $400 smart phones and expect to break a handset or two per year. Insurance for smart phones is more expensive, but at the time my VX4500 was originally purchased, the MSRP was just under $200. The manufacturer’s warranty on the handset lasts one year already anyway. After one year, the selection of phones will have advanced significantly anyway. If you needed to replace the phone exactly 1 year and 1 day after you bought it, you would be faced with one of two options. Without insurance, you would be liable to pay for a new phone out-of-pocket — another $200 spent, but you’ll have the newest latest model again. With insurance, you’d have already spent $71.88 in premiums. The additional $50 deductible, for a total of $121.88, to replace your original phone may be a good value. But after two years, the nearly $200 in combined premiums and deductible to replace the phone would likely not be a good value, since the phone will have depreciated significantly as new handsets replace it on the market. After three years, the $270 combined spent on the insurance and claim would easily have paid for a new handset with superior features.
But it gets even better — usually Verizon Wireless can work something out with you to give you another free phone after 2 years when you go to renew your contract. So why file a claim at all after two years? You could get a brand new phone free! Oddly, the agent I spoke with at the insurer sympathized with me when I pointed this out. I should get a new phone from Verizon if that was a better deal. But that seemed absurd — we’d apparently paid for insurance premiums for nearly 4 years on 2 handsets for a total of over $400 in premiums. The solution they offered for that price paid was a discontinued handset that was worth less than the deductible, and when I pointed out this was a bad deal, they suggested I get a new phone with a new Verizon contract.
Knowing that I could get the exact same handset I had for under $10, I chose not to proceed with the insurance claim. I canceled the insurance service the next day. My girlfriend had the exact same phone before she upgraded to a BlackBerry. She gave the phone to me, and Verizon Wireless was able to set up the phone over-the-air when I dialed 611, and even waived the usual $19.95 fee because of my discount plan. The phone was replaced by my girlfriend’s goodwill for a total cost of $0. It’s like my phone is brand new.
Unfortunately, the insurance company got away with murder thanks to the poor choice in selecting the insurance when my mother set up the plan. There is a sort of happy ending to this story though. I went to their website, and found a list of the names of their management team. I sent a strongly worded email to the company’s senior officers using the format “first.lastname@company.com”. Sure enough, all of the emails went through except one that bounced back. In my email, I promised that I’d find at least one other customer of theirs and convince them to cancel.
I got a call back that day from their corporate offices and spoke with the director of their entire customer service operation. She seemed a bit mystified that I didn’t want to accept the replacement handsets, despite my explanation that it simply was a bad value because the deductible was so high. The customer service director ended up settling with me for cash! I received $100 in traveler’s checks via overnight FedEx, as a gesture of goodwill. In return, as a gesture of goodwill, I’ve masked the name of their company, although I still didn’t make it very hard to figure out what the company’s name is.
At the end of the day, it’s just generally a bad value to buy these handset insurance plans. Make sure you really understand what you’re buying when you get insurance and extended warranties. A good rule of thumb with insurance is to insure only things that you can’t afford to replace. Things like your life, your house, and your car fall into this category for most people. Things like your TV, your power tools, your computer, and your cellular handset just usually aren’t worth that much to begin with. Skip the insurance on these small items and spend them on something more worthwhile.
The old phone, on the left, seen with its cracked external screen and aluminum twist-tie antenna.
The keypads may look similar, but the phone on the left can been seen missing superficial covers over the screw holes. Also the buttons on the side didn’t work on the old phone.
With the backs removed, it’s obvious these phones are actually not identical. I noticed a few differences between the phones after careful examination. The first was that the “new” phone lacks the Scheduler tool, however the new phone has the “voice scheduler” and “driving mode” options in the “voice” menu. Also in the “sounds” settings menu, the new phone has “speaker phone” while the old phone has “speaker” options. Finally, the old phone has an option “ERI alerts” under the “alerts” sounds settings menu. The “phone info” menu also indicated two other differences: the old phone’s software version was “T45VZV04″ vs the new phone’s seemingly older version “T45VZV02″, and the new phone had an ERI version of “ERI4″ vs the new phone’s version of “ERI 50018″.
They were nice enough to send me back $100 of the $420 in wasted insurance premiums that we’d paid. Then again, I did tell them I was going to make a point to get at least one other person to drop their service. Since they were nice enough to give me that gesture, I’ve shielded their name. Still, they made a solid couple hundred bucks off it over the years. Also it’s hard for me to feel too bad for them when were ready to charge me a $50 deductible, plus shipping, to send me a phone that I could get on eBay for half that price plus shipping. It would be like having a $10000 deductible on car insurance even though you paid $500 a month. Hardly a worthwhile investment.
Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
So clearly, there’s something to Facebook that makes them so appealing to consumers and apparently valuable. Facebook is an e-marketing wet dream. Few other sites can boast that their users volunteer so much demographic data, ranging from their age to their relationship status to their political views to their favorite James Blunt song. Privacy advocates be damned — this generation can’t help but share with the world every little detail about themselves.
Social networking sites like Facebook contain some features that help users control their privacy, but let’s be real: if you’re posting something on the Internet, there’s a good chance that someone will eventually see it. Herein lies the problem: it becomes very difficult to control data once it hits the Internet, since digital files can be infinitely reproduced at no cost with no loss. Anyone that ever downloaded an MP3 illegally understands how this can work to their benefit. With that said, this article will explain how to ensure you are accessing the most content you are permitted to view. So first, a disclaimer: depending on how you define “hacks”, this may not be a “hack”. Feel free to refer to it as a “trick” instead if you’re a pedantic grammar-police volunteer.
Facebook at least attempts to pretend it cares about user security since it first launched. However, numerous exploits soon surfaced (covered elsewhere on this blog). I was once even approached by (presumably) Russian spammers that learned I had a technique to harvest email addresses from Facebook. It may not be so easy to harvest emails anymore, but one thing is for sure: most people don’t understand how to set privacy permissions on their photo albums. When you create a photo album on Facebook, the default “Album Privacy” setting is to allow your album to be shared with, well, everyone! But, while “everyone” may be able to access the photo album, not everyone is able to access your profile. To further confuse things, photo album privacy settings are set from the album itself, not from the usual privacy console. So without further ado, here is a technique to browse photo albums that you normally would never be able to browse. The only requirement is that you must already have access to one photo in the album.
So, for example, you load up your friend’s profile, and click “View Photos of Me”. Now, under “Added by others” you should see a whole set of photos that were added by that person’s friends. Click any photo added by someone else. This will load the photo page. If you click “Next”, you will be taken to the next photo of your friend - not the next photo in the original gallery. Here is the hack: to view the photos in the original gallery, you just need to edit the URL you’re at. Let’s say the photo’s URL is: (and note this is NOT a valid URL)
Note that the “pid” and “id” values have changed, but the “subj” value did not. The “subj” value is the user ID of the person you’re friends with. The “op” and “view” values tell Facebook what type of navigation to give you (i.e. where the “next” and “previous” links point to). Let’s reload that first photo again without all the clutter. Delete everything from the URL besides the “pid” and “id” values. The new URL will look like this:
Now, click “next”. Notice that it’s probably not the same photo that you saw when you clicked “next” last time. That’s because now, you are loading the photo as if you are browsing the gallery. Instead of browsing by “subj” (photos of the person you know), you’re now just loading the photo. And remember, you have permissions to load that photo because the default gallery permission is that “Everyone” can.
I find this very useful for finding photos of someone that may have been untagged. For example, if your friend was at a party, and their friends uploaded 10 photos of them, maybe they started to get a little tipsy at the end of the night and didn’t want people so see those last 9 photos, so they untagged all but one. Load that one still-tagged photo, hack the URL as described above, and you can see the remaining photos.
I’d love to hear feedback on this — whether you consider it a hack, a bug, an annoyance, or even just a feature!
Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
“As a GoDaddy customer, I am extremely concerned about GoDaddy’s behavior in deleting DNS records for ‘RateMyCop.com’. Continued behavior in this regard will force me to switch to another domain registrar & host.”
The situation with the Web site RateMyCop was absolutely NOT about censorship in ANY way.
The site’s operator has publicly disclosed the concerns were over bandwidth. More accurately, Go Daddy’s concerns were about how the RateMyCop site was far exceeding the amount of server usage for which it had contracted.
This customer paid for a shared server plan. The connections to his site were six times more than an entire ’shared server’ accommodates. While he was paying for a service that cost $14.99 a month, his site actually required a much more extensive set-up.
Basically, he was paying for compact car, when he really needed a semi-truck.
The customer was not willing to work with our staff to resolve the issue.
While the “censorship” allegations certainly make for an edgy “story,” they simply had nothing to do with this situation.
The Internet has delivered a cornucopia of police abuse videos. More than ever, we are confronted with amateur videos of police brutality and plain old lack of professionalism. Way back in 1992, was one of the most prominent examples of this, with the amateur taping of the Rodney King beating. Without police oversight, guys like like this guy (below), continue indulging themselves and getting high on their own power. Watch as this cop from Baltimore tells a 14 year old that his behavior will get him killed (2:05):
I think GoDaddy needs to step up to the plate, and publicly apologize for any wrong doing, and even if they weren’t wrong, make right on the bandwidth issue — a now highly public issue — by offering the RateMyCop.com authors some massive hosting package for a year. Bob Parsons, a former marine, once fought to protect our freedoms — so it sure would be a shame to see his company do just the opposite.
Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Please, can someone, anyone, explain a legitimate reason that a dollar store would be selling $60 wedding cake candles?
Why do I have a feeling that not too many people are doing wedding planning at the dollar store? If these wedding cake candles are like anything else at the dollar store (read: made in China), this thing has got to be either made of lead or it will burst into flames when you light it.
Seriously, WTF is this?
Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
The first encounter I had with paid hosting services was Ipowerweb, now known as just Ipower. Their shared hosting service worked well for me for quite a while at a decent price, although I quickly learned that shared hosting was not-so-great when another user on the system was able to turn the server into a massive spam machine, hijacking my HTML in the process. Ipower was particularly clueless about what might have happened, and a later problem with their domain registration services finally put me off for good. So for quite some time now, this site has been hosted on a GoDaddy virtual private server.
A virtual private server allows webmasters to enjoy security and stability benefits of a dedicated server at a lower cost by sharing a larger server’s hardware amongst separate hosting customers. One major drawback however is that the virtual server is usually not supported by the hosting provider, leaving often inexperienced hosting customers to administer their own systems. Being an informed admin, I was prepared for the day when I got the email below:
Dear Peter, Regarding your server -- ineedattention. Due to the security and development improvements to the Fedora System, we will be discontinuing support for the following Operating Systems as of March 15, 2008: [...] Fedora Core 4 [...] We recommend that you upgrade the server as outlined below at your earliest convenience. [...] Once the plan change completes, a server reprovision is necessary. Please note that by doing this; all data on the server will be erased. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you make a backup of your data before continuing. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns which you have in relation to this matter. Thanks again for choosing GoDaddy.com servers. Sincerely, GoDaddy.com
Considering they outright tell you this will re-provision your server and cause data loss if done improperly, I was hoping this would go a little smoother than the last time I had to upgrade my GoDaddy virtual private server, although last time I was upgrading the Plesk interface, and not the operating system. I figured if anything, it would be more of a hassle to upgrade the operating system.
Surprisingly, the transition was relatively smooth with a few strange quirks. Some of the quirks may have been deal-breakers for other admins, but I was pretty lucky to be able to say things are running smoothly again. Read more to find out what went wrong and how things were fixed.
